Amsterdam Spends Wisely

According to the Amsterdam City Charter, the Budget Review Board consists of the Mayor, five Alderman and City Controller who each have a deciding vote. The preliminary budget is supposed to be prepared by the Controller after the department heads have each submitted their proposed budget requests. March 1, 2013, is the date the working tentative budget should be presented and May 1, 2013, is the date the Budget Review Board is to adopt a final budget.

Since this writer has kept track (about five years), the budget review process has never gone smoothly. I never understood why the City of Amsterdam Controller, an elected position, had a vote on  city budget matters or the Mayor either for that matter. The legislative body of government (Alderman) was formed for that purpose while the executive (Mayor) approved or vetoed legislation.

This year’s budget negotiation is without a Controller. The City of Amsterdam’s last Controller, Ron Wierzbecki, died in December and the Common Council decided to continue without appointing an interim. Instead they chose to create a Deputy Controller, an appointed position to serve in that capacity. An experienced accountant, David Mitchell was hired to the $75,000, 6 year post. Things seem to be going smoothly since he took over the reins but I’m sure he still has some catching up to do.

The City of Amsterdam Budget Review Board met on Tuesday, April 23, 2013, to hear budget presentations from City Department heads. This year’s Budget Review Board consists of Mayor Ann Thane, 1st Ward Alderman Joe Isabel, 2nd Ward Alderman Valerie Beekman, 3rd Ward Alderman Gina DeRossi, 4th Ward Alderman Dave Dybas, 5th Ward Alderman Richard Leggiero, Corporation Counsel Gerard DeCusatis and Deputy Controller David Mitchell. Legally the Deputy Controller and Corporation Counsel have no vote on the city budget. Corporation Counsel DeCusatis certainly had his say in both preparing the budget and active negotiations. It seems he has stepped in the role of  Controller.  In fact, the preliminary budget was prepared by Thane and DeCusatis who took it upon themselves to add items and even new employees to the department head budgets without their consent. This revealed itself as the department heads each presented their budgets last night.

Amsterdam Municipal Golf Course Maintenance Supervisor Jim Derrick

Amsterdam Municipal Golf Course Maintenance Supervisor Jim Derrick

_MG_1517

Mayor Ann Thane, Corporation Counsel Gerard DeCusatis, Alderman Valerie Beekman, Alderman Gina Derossi, Alderman Joe Isabel

_MG_1520

DeCuasatis, Beekman, DeRossi, Isabel

_MG_1524

Jim Derrick, Golf Commission Chairman Mike Bucciferro

_MG_1526

Amsterdam City Engineer Richard Miller

_MG_1528

Rick Morrison reporting live from the budget hearing

_MG_1530

Ann Thane, Gerard DeCusatis

_MG_1531

Deputy Controller David Mitchell, Alderman Richard Leggiero, Alderman Dave Dybas

_MG_1533

DPW General Foreman Ray Halgas

_MG_1535

Transportation Director Cheryl Scott

_MG_1537

Recreation Director Rob Spagnola

_MG_1539

Recorder Reporter Rebecca Webster

_MG_1540

Rebecca Webster

_MG_1545

Mitchell, Leggiero, Dybas

Director of Community and Economic Development Robert von Hasseln

Director of Community and Economic Development Robert von Hasseln

_MG_1550

Rob von Hasseln

Placed in the Amsterdam Municipal Golf Course budget was a cart fee of $2.00 per cart applicable to everyone driving a cart on the course. The Review Board decided to remove that fee with Alderman Beekman stating it was unfair for those that own carts housed at the course who already pay cart storage and membership fees. There was a discussion about hiring a general manager for the course next year but that was not figured in their budget for this season.

City Engineer Richard Miller argued for increased hours for his secretary from 30 to 35 hours a week. That request was approved pending a Civil Service agreement.

DPW General Foreman Ray Halgas found a newly created supervisor position in his budget that Mayor Thane admitted she placed there. The Mayor wanted the position to keep an eye on crews and people who tend to take too long during breaks. She stated her office constantly receives calls that DPW crews are hanging out at Stewarts or other convenience stores for extended periods of time. This new employee position was voted down by the Budget Review Board.  Halgas seemed a bit uneasy about the Montgomery Otsego Schoharie Solid Waste Management agreement scheduled to end this time next year with no current negotiation pending for a replacement or new contract.  Alderman Dybas congratulated Halgas for finally getting both street sweepers working. Halgas stated a new sweeper will arrive this year, describing problems he has had maintaining the older sweepers.

Transportation Director Cheryl Scott presented her budget with an irregularity noticed in last year’s electric bill that the Deputy Controller stated he would help work out. As an aside, Alderman Isabel turned to the media table of reporters to state the Transportation Budget requires a taxpayer subsidy amounting to $326,000 per year to run. Low cost transportation is provided around the City of Amsterdam, to County Offices in Fonda, To Fulton-Montgomery Community College as well as daily trips to Albany, NY.

Recreation Director Rob Spagnola has taken on added responsibilities this year with the establishment the Beacon School Recreation Center and the Creative Connections Art Center. With help from a part-time Recreation Assistant, programming was created for both the young and old. The addition of Union College Baseball to Shuttleworth Park will bring astro turf paving. Spagnola asked for a salary increase for himself and full-time hours for his assistant stating he was the oldest tenured Director who loves his job and has never asked for a salary increase before. The Recreation budget also included a $10,000 revolving fund to help defray costs of programming, with the understanding that the money would be replenished from programming services rendered. His requests were unanimously approved by the Board.

Director of Community and Economic Development Rob von Hasseln completed his first year in the new position, giving a status report of developments. He reiterated that while still performing the City Historian job, he no longer receives the $5,000 stipend. Von Hasseln also stated that he saves the City money by not accepting the health insurance as he already has health insurance through his US Army retirement. Von Hasseln was also responsible for helping to create and sell the revolving fund for recreation services. Thanks Rob!

While this three-hour Budget Review Board meeting was only one of many, it does seem things are running better than earlier years. Only time (tax and utility bills) will tell.

Advertisements
Categories: Amsterdam, Law, Politics | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Post navigation

3 thoughts on “Amsterdam Spends Wisely

  1. diane

    Jerry, You did a great job recounting last nights meeting. Just a couple of things. GD also added in another 40,000.00 in administration fees to the golf budget. They already pay the city 50,000.00 for this service and with their new computer registers at the club, there should be less work for the city. So trying to tack on the other 40,000.00 was not needed. (Just a way for the mayor GD to transfer more revenue to the general fund.) or put another way, money to balance the budget in the general fund.

    The mayor was responsible for putting forth the new DPW position to track those employees. If she was a good administrator she would deal with the real problem which is a lack of supervision from Mr. Halgas. She is afraid to deal with him directly, so this is how she is going about it. This is called poor management . Tell Mr. Halgas to do his job.

  2. Diane, I believe the $40,000 was to balance the health insurance premiums that are much lower this year and for the increased revenue expected from the cart fees. I believe they agreed to reduce that amount to $32,000.

  3. diane

    Jerry,

    The health fees being lower is fine, but why do they have to balance it back? All GD is trying to do is generate more revenue for the general fund. The Golf Fund should be able to relish in the fact they have some money in their reserves. Does not mean the money should support the general fund so the mayor has more money to spend 🙂

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: